Skip to main content

Open Policy Agent

gitlab

Open Policy Agent is a general-purpose open-source policy engine already graduated at CNCF. Pronounced "oh-pa", it is a powerful and increasingly popular tool in the world of cloud-native computing and beyond.

Open Policy Agent allows you to specify policies as code, which can be used to enforce policies across microservices, Kubernetes, API gateways, etc., all through the Rego language.

  • Decouple policy decision logic from your software/service. Instead of hardcoding authorization rules (who can do what?) directly into your application, you define them externally in OPA.

  • Unify policy enforcement across different parts of your technology stack (Kubernetes, microservices, CI/CD pipelines, databases, etc.).

  • Use a high-level declarative language called Rego to write these policies.

Imagine you have multiple applications, microservices, and systems. Each of them needs to make policy-based decisions. Some examples:

  • A Kubernetes cluster needs to decide whether a pod can be created in a specific namespace.

  • A microservice needs to decide whether a user has permission to access a specific resource.

  • A CI/CD pipeline needs to verify if a Docker image meets security standards.

  • A Terraform provider needs to validate whether the infrastructure to be created is compliant.

Traditionally, the logic for these decisions would be scattered and hardcoded in each system, using different languages and approaches, and this leads to:

  • Inconsistency: Different policies for similar problems.
  • Audit Difficulty: How do you know which policies are in effect across your entire stack?
  • Management Complexity: Updating policies becomes a nightmare.
  • Duplication of Effort: Reimplementing policy logic repeatedly.

"Open Policy Agent emerges as a modern solution to an old problem: how to manage and enforce policies consistently and in a decoupled manner across distributed systems.

OPA's core concept works based on a simple model:

  1. Query: Your service/application asks OPA a question. For example: "Can user 'David' perform the 'read' action on the '/data/financial' resource?" This query is typically JSON.

  2. Policy + Data: OPA evaluates this query based on:

    • Policies written in Rego: These are the rules that define the desired behavior.
    • Data (optional): Contextual information that OPA can use to make the decision (e.g., user attributes, resource tags, etc.). This data can also be provided as JSON.

  3. Decision: OPA returns a decision, typically in JSON format (e.g., {"allow": true} or {"allow": false, "reason": "User does not belong to 'finance' group"}").

Important: OPA makes the decision but does not enforce it. Your service/application is responsible for receiving OPA's decision and acting accordingly (allowing or denying the action, for example).

Benefits of Using OPA​

  • Flexibility: Can be used for a wide range of use cases.
  • Decoupling: Separates policy logic from application code.
  • Consistency: A single way to define and manage policies across the entire stack.
  • Testability: Policies in Rego can be tested as code.
  • Auditability: Centralized decisions facilitate logging and auditing.
  • Performance: Designed to be lightweight and fast.
  • Community and Ecosystem: Graduated CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) project with an active community and many integrations.

Common Use Cases​

  • Kubernetes: Admission Control, API authorization.
  • Microservices: API authorization (in API Gateways, Service Meshes like Istio/Envoy).
  • CI/CD Pipelines: Ensure builds and deployments follow the rules.
  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Validate Terraform, CloudFormation configurations.
  • Applications: Fine-grained authorization within applications.
  • Databases: Data access control.

Comparison with OPA​

Comparing OPA with other tools helps understand its unique positioning and value. Here are some useful comparisons showing different purposes.

  • Hardcoded Authorization Logic Directly in Application

    Instead of having if/else statements scattered throughout your application code to check permissions, you externalize this logic to OPA, enabling centralized management, updates without application re-deployment, and a unified language (Rego).

  • Platform-Specific RBAC Systems (e.g., Kubernetes RBAC, Database RBAC)

    Many systems already come with their own RBAC mechanisms. Kubernetes RBAC, for example, defines who (users, groups, service accounts) can do what (verbs like get, list, create) on which resources (pods, services) within namespaces.

    • Granularity and Flexibility: RBAC is role-based. OPA, with Rego, allows much more granular and contextual policies (Attribute-Based Access Control - ABAC, Relationship-Based Access Control - ReBAC, or any custom logic). You can base decisions on any data: time of day, IP location, resource tags, data from an external system, etc. When native RBAC is not sufficient for your policy needs, OPA solves the problem.

    • Unification: Kubernetes RBAC only works for Kubernetes. Your database's RBAC only works for your database. OPA can provide a unified policy layer on top of or alongside these systems, or even for systems that don't have a good authorization mechanism of their own. In Kubernetes, OPA (via Gatekeeper) is often used for Admission Control, which is a richer form of policy than RBAC alone can offer.

  • Cloud Provider IAMs (e.g., AWS IAM, Azure RBAC, Google Cloud IAM) These are identity and access management systems specific to each cloud provider. They control access to cloud resources.

    • IAMs are for resources within that cloud. OPA is general-purpose and can be used within applications, for Kubernetes (which can run on any cloud or on-premise), for CI/CD pipelines, etc.
    • OPA can act as an abstraction layer if you need consistent policies that apply to multiple clouds or between cloud and on-premise. You would still use the underlying IAM, but OPA could help generate or validate IAM policies across the board.

  • Other Authorization Libraries/Frameworks (e.g., Casbin, Spring Security with custom expressions)

    Casbin is an authorization library that supports access control models like ACL, RBAC, ABAC. Frameworks like Spring Security allow defining authorization rules.

    • OPA uses Rego, which is a powerful and declarative query language inspired by Datalog, designed to query complex data structures (like JSON) and is extremely flexible. Casbin is more focused on simple access control models for standard access control use cases.
    • OPA is often run as a separate service (daemon), while libraries are typically embedded in the application.

  • Configuration/Schema Validation Tools (e.g., JSON Schema, specific linters)

    • Tools like JSON Schema validate if a JSON document is structurally correct. Linters check syntax and sometimes some best practices.
    • OPA can do schema validation but goes much further. With Rego, you can write complex validation logic that checks not only structure but also values and relationships between different parts of data, and even cross-reference with external data. When validation needs to go beyond basic structure and involve business logic or complex compliance rules. For example, "a container cannot run as root and must have CPU limits defined".

  • Traditional Rules Engines (e.g., Drools) Rules engines like Drools (Java) also externalize business logic into rules.

    • Lightweight and Focused: OPA is designed to be lightweight, fast, and optimized for working with JSON, making it ideal for cloud-native environments and microservices. Traditional engines can be heavier and have a steeper learning curve.
    • Language: Rego is declarative and focused on querying data.
    • OPA shines in authorization, admission control, configuration validation. Traditional rules engines may have a broader scope in complex enterprise systems.

For typical OPA use cases (authorization, validation in modern stacks), especially where performance, lightweight footprint, and integration with JSON/APIs are important.